A question on production stats. Where something is produced in multiple stages (e.g. one person produces Magnetometric Sensor Clusters then another person uses those as precursors to build an Oneiros), is that considered two acts of production? If so that will distort the figures somewhat.

A few important things I'd like to note:
[...]
* Production values are end products, not components.
[...]

It's a completely different issue dealing with the run of the mill gankers in high sec than if you have a high value target which can only be built at a POS and takes over a month to complete.

A quick random collection of numbers that came to mind as "interesting":

Total 2013 destruction : 476.5 Trillion ISK

The 2014 B-R5RB Battle (11T ISK) :
- 8.4 days worth of total EVE universe destruction in 2013 (2.4% of total)
- 1.1 years of total Jita destruction (Jita is a crazy place!)

Jita :
- 2% of total universe destruction (Jita is a crazy place!)
- It takes the 1,948 safest places in EVE (25.3% of EVE) to surpass the destruction in Jita
- 2.8 times as destructive as the 2nd most (Amarr)


Polaris: Only system with Zero destruction what so ever (Polaris is a boring place!)
- and btw not reachable by mere mortals.
- and is probably there by mistake - as it seems Jove space has in fact been excluded.

Safest (actually reachable) 2013 system : O9K-FT (The Kalevala Expanse) with just 56.3M ISK worth destroyed.


Top 20 of systems (0.2% of all systems) has 10% of all destruction.
Top 462 systems (6% of all systems) has 50% of all destruction.


High-sec (14.3% of systems) : 27.8% of all destruction - 199.8B ISK/system
Low-sec (10.4% of systems) : 25.8% of all destruction - 153.1B ISK/system
Null-sec (42.8% of systems) : 36.9% of all destruction - 53.4 B ISK/system
WH-space (32.4% of systems) : 9.5% of all destruction - 18.1 B ISK/system